[discuss] pud_offset_k

Andi Kleen ak at suse.de
Tue May 23 16:00:49 CEST 2006

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Andi,
> is there any reason x86-64, as the only architecture, continues to have pud_offset_k() and __pud_offset_k()? This would
> seem like a left-over from 3-level-page-tables days.

No. I converted the one user and removed it now. Thanks.


More information about the discuss mailing list